Author Topic: Propagation Bulletin 2/18/15  (Read 1399 times)

k4lrx

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2187
Propagation Bulletin 2/18/15
« on: February 18, 2015, 12:01:41 PM »


   
ARLP007 Propagation de K7RA
ARRL Web site
To
me
Feb 13 at 7:06 PM
SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP007
ARLP007 Propagation de K7RA

ZCZC AP07
QST de W1AW
Propagation Forecast Bulletin 7  ARLP007
From Tad Cook, K7RA
Seattle, WA  February 13, 2015
To all radio amateurs

SB PROP ARL ARLP007
ARLP007 Propagation de K7RA

We saw solar indices drop this week. Average daily sunspot numbers
dropped from 139 to 81.6, while average daily solar flux went from
151.1 to 144.1.

Geomagnetic indices were more stable this week, with average daily
planetary A index going from 14.7 to 8.4, and average mid-latitude A
index declining from 9.4 to 6.6.

The two 7-day periods compared here are January 29 through February
4, and February 5 to 11.

Predicted solar flux for the near term is 120, 125, 130 and 135 on
February 13 to 16, 140 on February 17 and 18, 135 on February 19 and
20, 140 on February 21 and 22, 145 on February 23 to 26, 150 on
February 27 and 28, 145 on March 1, 140 on March 2 to 7, and 135 on
March 8 to 10. Solar flux then reaches a low of 125 on March 12 and
13, a high of 140 on March 16 and 17, and back to 125 on March 21
and 22.

Predicted planetary A index is 8 on February 13 and 14, then 12, 15,
10, and 8 on February 15 to 18, 5 on February 19 to 21, 15 and 12 on
February 22 and 23, 10 on February 24 to 27,  20 on February 28
through March 1, 15 on March 2, 10 on March 3 and 4, 5 on March 5
and 6, 8 on March 7, 10 on March 8, and 8 on March 9 to 12.

F. K. Janda, OK1HH believes that geomagnetic conditions will be
quiet to unsettled February 13, quiet to active February 14 and 15,
mostly quiet February 16, quiet to active February 17 and 18, quiet
February 19, mostly quiet February 20, quiet February 21, quiet to
unsettled February 22 to 27, active to disturbed February 28,
disturbed March 1, active to disturbed March 2, quiet to unsettled
March 3 and 4, mostly quiet March 5, quiet March 6, mostly quiet
March 7, quiet to active March 8, quiet to unsettled March 9, quiet
to active March 10, and quiet March 11.

He expects peaks in solar wind on February 15, 19 and 20, 25, 28,
March 1 and 8.

Scott Bidstrup, TI3/W7RI wrote:

Here's an interesting article that says we've been miscounting
historical sunspot activity from the last few centuries. And when
corrected for the error, activity in past centuries has apparently
really been pretty much the same as now, rather than the last few
cycles being anomalously high as had previously been thought:

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2015/02/10/the.suns.activity.18th.century.was.similar.now

W7RI continues:

"Propagation for the much-anticipated K1N DXpedition to Navassa has
been a bit poorer here on the higher HF bands than might be expected
for the high 304a index numbers we've been seeing over the last week
or two, but the much-increased activity in 6 meters has made up for
it down here.

Here in Central America, lots of the local hams have been getting
their Qs in with K1N, mostly on 80 and 40, with a few on 160 and 20.
Signals on 15 and 10 have been disappointing to say the least,
probably because we're just too close here for those bands. But 20,
30 and 40 have been really great and some have had Qs on 160, with
the low winter noise levels and the improved lower HF propagation of
recent days. Jay, HP3AK, has been getting in his daily Qs with Japan
on 75 meters at his sunrise grayline quite reliably of late. The
upper HF bands have been a bit disappointing, however, with signals
on 10 meters a fair bit weaker than might be expected, and 15 meters
nothing to write home about. But since everyone's attentions here
have been focused entirely on the Navassa DXpedition, none of that
has much mattered.

After a long lull in 6 meter activity as a result of the abysmal
304a numbers, with practically no openings, the last week in January
began to see some evening TEP from here into South America, and I
was able to work my first Bolivia on 6 meter SSB about a week ago. I
heard an HR1 on 6 quite loudly for a couple of minutes late one
evening, but wasnt able to work him before he faded, and Michael,
TI5XP, who is desperate for HR1 on 6, was cursing himself for having
gone to bed early that night.

The Navassa fixation has had its effect on six here, too, with
everyone spending their afternoons and evenings, eyes glued to their
waterfalls for any hints of the K1N beacon on 50.103.
Unfortunately, with 6 meters being the usual DXpedition stepchild,
the 6 meter radio at K1N has apparently been unmanned, but just left
on with the squelch up in the mess tent where someone on a Gatorade
break would hopefully hear it if an opening happened. So as a
result, everyone here has been blasting away at it between beacon
transmissions all day and all night, hoping to break squelch and
attract some attention. The LU/PYs seem to have had the most success
during the nightly TEP openings, and Florida has been in second
place, but here in Central America, we're broadside from the K1N
beam when it is aimed at either region, so the best we can hope for
is backscatter when aiming towards PY during the evening TEP
openings. Doctor Andy, YS1AG, using that strategy, has reported the
greatest success from Central America, with two Qs on 6 meters,
sadly, neither of which have shown up in the log so far, apparently,
we find out, because theyre being recorded on paper and don't go
out in the daily Clublog updates."

Thanks, Scott. For an explanation of the 304A index he refers to,
see http://www.bidstrup.com/w7ri-hf-radio-propagation.htm and search
for 304A.

From that page: "The 304A Index is the relative strength of total
solar ultraviolet radiation at a wavelength of 304 angstroms,
emitted primarily by ionized helium in the sun's photosphere."

Patrick Dyer, WA5IYX of San Antonio, Texas wrote:

"Feb 4 1800-1900z the W5-7 area (mostly) had a 50-MHz F2 event to
IK1EGC/MM as he moved from DJ03 to CJ93.

One has to wonder how often these events occur to the 'water grids',
which (lacking any /MM ops) could only be noticed by backscatter
effects.

This is a text version (transcribed from an audio tape) of K5CM's
excellent presentation on backscatter at the August 1979 Central
States VHF Society Conference in Irving, TX. I wish that I had
access to the several slides of the oscilloscope traces that he used
in that.

http://www.qsl.net/wa5iyx/papers/k5cm1979.txt

I'll leave it to the Floridians et al who have benefited over the
recent weeks with several 50-MHz Es links into South American F2/TEP
paths to detail those events."

Later he wrote:

"No sooner than I sent that info for Feb 4 a repeat event occurs
today (his having moved to CJ83), best seen on this plot:

http://www.qsl.net/wa5iyx/images/20150207_1911z_last_50_W2LN_dxc.gif

Some labeled it as multi-hop Es, but with an azimuth spread of
almost 90-deg from him to approximately the same ranges I'm pretty
sure that it was F2 again as the Australian IPS global map of foF2
for the time period today also hints at. The chances of double-hop
Es lining up over such a large sector near noon in February is
rather low."

For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL
Technical Information Service at
http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals. For an explanation of the
numbers used in this bulletin, see
http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere. An archive of past
propagation bulletins is at
http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation. More good
information and tutorials on propagation are at http://k9la.us/.

Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve
overseas locations are at http://arrl.org/propagation.

Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL
bulletins are at http://arrl.org/bulletins.

Sunspot numbers for February 5 through 11 were 86, 71, 80, 94, 82,
82, and 76, with a mean of 81.6. 10.7 cm flux was 141.9, 143.3, 153,
152.8, 145.8, 141, and 131.1, with a mean of 144.1.  Estimated
planetary A indices were 13, 5, 9, 10, 8, 7, and 7, with a mean of
8.4. Estimated mid-latitude A indices were 10, 4, 9, 7, 5, 6, and 5,
with a mean of 6.6.
NNNN
/EX

Reply, Reply All or Forward | More
Click to reply all